Wednesday, August 01, 2007

Rumsfeld defends himself on Tillman

01 August, 2007

By ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld defended himself and took no personal responsibility Wednesday for the military‘s bungled response to Army Ranger Pat Tillman‘s friendly-fire death in Afghanistan.

He told a House committee hearing that he‘d always impressed upon Pentagon underlings the importance of telling the truth.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Unanswered questions about the bungled response to Army Ranger Pat Tillman‘s friendly-fire death in Afghanistan reach into the highest ranks of the Pentagon and beyond, a key Democrat charged Wednesday.

"The concealment of Corp. Tillman‘s fratricide caused millions of Americans to question the integrity of our government, yet no one will tell us when and how the White House learned the truth," said Waxman, D-Calif.

Both joined him at the witness table.

"Are you not ashamed?" one said. Rumsfeld didn‘t react.

Tillman‘s mother Mary and other family members watched from the last row in the committee room.

The Army censured Kensinger for "a failure of leadership" and accused him of lying to investigators probing the aftermath of Tillman‘s death. For five weeks the Army knew Tillman was cut down by his fellow Army Rangers, but told the public and Tillman‘s own family that he died in a fire fight with enemy militia.

"I have no knowledge of any evidence to that end," Geren told a Pentagon briefing Tuesday after announcing Kensinger‘s censure.

That wasn‘t good enough for Democrats, who along with Tillman‘s family suspect a cover-up that goes all the way to the White House.

The punishments "do nothing to lift the appearance of cover-up that continues to envelop the Pat Tillman story," said Rep. Mike Honda, D-Calif., who represents Tillman‘s hometown of San Jose.

"It is inconceivable that numerous top-ranking generals ... were aware of the true circumstances of Pat‘s death, but did not inform their civilian superiors — President Bush and then-Secretary Rumsfeld," said Honda, promising to "hold these commanders‘ feet to the fire" at Wednesday‘s hearing.

Waxman wanted to hear from Kensinger, and the committee issued a subpoena Monday for his testimony. As the hearing began U.S. marshals still hadn‘t been able to deliver it.

Kensinger‘s attorney, Charles W. Gittins, said Tuesday night that Kensinger was away on business travel.

"He declined the committee invitation to testify two weeks ago, so it was no surprise to the committee that he had no intent to participate in a hearing that is all about show and no substance," Gittins said in an e-mail message to The Associated Press.

Gittins said his client "had no reason to lie" and had told investigators "everything he knows" about the case. In May, in a rebuttal letter to the general who reviewed the matter, Kensinger firmly rejected all accusations that he had lied.

Gittins also dismissed accusations that Kensinger should have told the Tillman family about the possibility of friendly fire, saying the retired general "was not the release authority for the information." That "release authority," Gittins said, was Gen. John Abizaid, then the head of the U.S. Central Command.

Tillman‘s death received worldwide attention because he had walked away from a huge contract with the National Football League‘s Arizona Cardinals to enlist in the Army after 9/11.

Among possible evidence of White House knowledge, lawmakers have cited a memo written by a top general seven days after Tillman‘s death warning it was "highly possible" the Army Ranger was killed by his own comrades and making clear his warning should be conveyed to the president.

President Bush made no reference to the way Tillman died in a speech delivered two days after the memo was written.

A White House spokesman has said there‘s no indication Bush received the warning in the memo written April 29, 2004, by then-Maj. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to Abizaid.

Abizaid was on the witness list for Wednesday‘s hearing.

McChrystal was spared punishment in the investigation report released Tuesday. The investigation concluded McChrystal behaved reasonably in assuming the supporting material for Tillman‘s Silver Star recommendation was accurate, and in conveying the message about the likelihood of friendly fire in Tillman‘s death.
Associated Press writers Richard Lardner in Washington and Scott Lindlaw in San Francisco contributed to this report.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Having had over fifteen years experience with the British Ministry Of Defence and their lies, I tend to smell a rat fairly quickly when it comes to military cover-up stories...this one smelled big time.

Too many people were falling over themselves to portray a heroic death, giving the impression this guy was the USA had.

I do not in any way wish to infer that Tillman was not a brave man but, many young men have died in this war and they barely receive a mention in the media. Please forgive me for saying this but, too much was made of the young man's bravery and his death.

The investigation now in progress on his death has me wondering, how many other young brave men have died in such a manner and no one but the Military Hierarchy know of it?

I would like to think the investigation on this death is normal practice but, I do not for one moment believe this to be a true fact.

This death has reached the top because of who Tillman was and not what he was when he died...a soldier in the field.

How many more of the brave lads in the field have died by friendly bullets and passed off as enemy kills?
Jan Manship Milligan